4G63 Turbo vs 6G75

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
6G75 ACCEPTABLE 72/100
+2 points over 4G63 Turbo
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE 4G63 Turbo Mitsubishi
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE 6G75 Mitsubishi

Specifications

4G63 Turbo
6G75
Brand
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
70
72
Years
1992--2007
2006--2020
Displacement
1997 cc
3828 cc
Layout
I4
V6
Type
Petrol Turbo
Petrol Na
Power
260--291 hp
250 hp
Known Issues
2
1
Total Risk Cost
€1,400--€3,500
€400--€800

Character

4G63 Turbo

"Legendary Evo I-IX engine. Cast-iron block, forged crank. Tuning icon. 600hp+ on stock internals possible. Maintenance-intensive."

6G75

"Pajero/Outlander. MIVEC variable timing. Timing belt (interference). Last big Mitsubishi V6. Oil consumption. Smooth power delivery. Reliable with belt maintenance."

Issues Comparison

4G63 Turbo 2

● MODERATE
Head gasket failure (high boost / neglect) €800--€2,000 100,000 km--200,000 km
○ MINOR
Turbo wear at extreme mileage €600--€1,500 200,000 km--∞

6G75 1

▲ HIGH
Timing belt (interference) €400--€800 60,000 km--90,000 km

Models

4G63 Turbo 0

No models listed.

6G75 1

Pajero V80/V90 2006--2013
Full 4G63 Turbo Report Full 6G75 Report