4G63 Turbo vs 6G74

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
6G74 ACCEPTABLE 72/100
+2 points over 4G63 Turbo
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE 4G63 Turbo Mitsubishi
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE 6G74 Mitsubishi

Specifications

4G63 Turbo
6G74
Brand
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
70
72
Years
1992--2007
1997--2006
Displacement
1997 cc
3497 cc
Layout
I4
V6
Type
Petrol Turbo
Petrol Na
Power
260--291 hp
203 hp
Known Issues
2
1
Total Risk Cost
€1,400--€3,500
€300--€800

Character

4G63 Turbo

"Legendary Evo I-IX engine. Cast-iron block, forged crank. Tuning icon. 600hp+ on stock internals possible. Maintenance-intensive."

6G74

"Pajero. GDI direct injection on later variants (problematic). NA MPFI version more reliable. Timing belt. Oil consumption. Adequate torque for Pajero."

Issues Comparison

4G63 Turbo 2

● MODERATE
Head gasket failure (high boost / neglect) €800--€2,000 100,000 km--200,000 km
○ MINOR
Turbo wear at extreme mileage €600--€1,500 200,000 km--∞

6G74 1

● MODERATE
GDI carbon buildup (DI variants) €300--€800 60,000 km--120,000 km

Models

4G63 Turbo 0

No models listed.

6G74 1

Pajero V60/V70 2000--2006
Full 4G63 Turbo Report Full 6G74 Report