4G63 Turbo vs 4B12

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
4B12 ACCEPTABLE 72/100
+2 points over 4G63 Turbo
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE 4G63 Turbo Mitsubishi
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE 4B12 Mitsubishi

Specifications

4G63 Turbo
4B12
Brand
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
70
72
Years
1992--2007
2007--2020
Displacement
1997 cc
2360 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Petrol Turbo
Petrol Na
Power
260--291 hp
168--170 hp
Known Issues
2
1
Total Risk Cost
€1,400--€3,500
€400--€800

Character

4G63 Turbo

"Legendary Evo I-IX engine. Cast-iron block, forged crank. Tuning icon. 600hp+ on stock internals possible. Maintenance-intensive."

4B12

"Outlander/ASX 2.4. Bigger bore 4B11. Adequate SUV power. Chain-driven. No major issues known."

Issues Comparison

4G63 Turbo 2

● MODERATE
Head gasket failure (high boost / neglect) €800--€2,000 100,000 km--200,000 km
○ MINOR
Turbo wear at extreme mileage €600--€1,500 200,000 km--∞

4B12 1

○ MINOR
Timing chain €400--€800 150,000 km--∞

Models

4G63 Turbo 0

No models listed.

4B12 3

Galant EA 1997--2004 Outlander GF/GG 2013--2021 Outlander 2.4 MIVEC GF 2012--2021 SUV
Full 4G63 Turbo Report Full 4B12 Report