4D68T vs 6G75

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
6G75 ACCEPTABLE 72/100
+2 points over 4D68T
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE 4D68T Mitsubishi
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE 6G75 Mitsubishi

Specifications

4D68T
6G75
Brand
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
70
72
Years
1995--2003
2006--2020
Displacement
1998 cc
3828 cc
Layout
I4
V6
Type
Diesel
Petrol Na
Power
90 hp
250 hp
Known Issues
1
1
Total Risk Cost
€200--€400
€400--€800

Character

4D68T

"Space Star/Carisma. Old indirect injection diesel. Timing belt. Simple. No common rail complexity. Economical. Glow plug failures. Adequate for the era."

6G75

"Pajero/Outlander. MIVEC variable timing. Timing belt (interference). Last big Mitsubishi V6. Oil consumption. Smooth power delivery. Reliable with belt maintenance."

Issues Comparison

4D68T 1

▲ HIGH
Timing belt €200--€400 60,000 km--90,000 km

6G75 1

▲ HIGH
Timing belt (interference) €400--€800 60,000 km--90,000 km

Models

4D68T 1

Galant EA 1997--2000

6G75 1

Pajero V80/V90 2006--2013
Full 4D68T Report Full 6G75 Report