4D68T vs 4B12

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
4B12 ACCEPTABLE 72/100
+2 points over 4D68T
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE 4D68T Mitsubishi
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE 4B12 Mitsubishi

Specifications

4D68T
4B12
Brand
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
70
72
Years
1995--2003
2007--2020
Displacement
1998 cc
2360 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Diesel
Petrol Na
Power
90 hp
168--170 hp
Known Issues
1
1
Total Risk Cost
€200--€400
€400--€800

Character

4D68T

"Space Star/Carisma. Old indirect injection diesel. Timing belt. Simple. No common rail complexity. Economical. Glow plug failures. Adequate for the era."

4B12

"Outlander/ASX 2.4. Bigger bore 4B11. Adequate SUV power. Chain-driven. No major issues known."

Issues Comparison

4D68T 1

▲ HIGH
Timing belt €200--€400 60,000 km--90,000 km

4B12 1

○ MINOR
Timing chain €400--€800 150,000 km--∞

Models

4D68T 1

Galant EA 1997--2000

4B12 3

Galant EA 1997--2004 Outlander GF/GG 2013--2021 Outlander 2.4 MIVEC GF 2012--2021 SUV
Full 4D68T Report Full 4B12 Report