4B11T vs 6G75

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
6G75 ACCEPTABLE 72/100
+10 points over 4B11T
0 / 100
CAUTION 4B11T Mitsubishi
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE 6G75 Mitsubishi

Specifications

4B11T
6G75
Brand
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi
Verdict
CAUTION
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
62
72
Years
2008--2015
2006--2020
Displacement
1998 cc
3828 cc
Layout
I4
V6
Type
Petrol Turbo
Petrol Na
Power
291--295 hp
250 hp
Known Issues
2
1
Total Risk Cost
€3,200--€9,000
€400--€800

Character

4B11T

"Evo X engine. Strong forged internals. Reliable if maintained to EVO standards. Abused examples suffer."

6G75

"Pajero/Outlander. MIVEC variable timing. Timing belt (interference). Last big Mitsubishi V6. Oil consumption. Smooth power delivery. Reliable with belt maintenance."

Issues Comparison

4B11T 2

▲ HIGH
Ringland failure — modified engines €2,000--€6,000 50,000 km--100,000 km
● MODERATE
Rod bearing wear under hard use €1,200--€3,000 80,000 km--150,000 km

6G75 1

▲ HIGH
Timing belt (interference) €400--€800 60,000 km--90,000 km

Models

4B11T 1

Lancer Evolution X CZ 2007--2016 Sedan

6G75 1

Pajero V80/V90 2006--2013
Full 4B11T Report Full 6G75 Report