4B11T vs 6G74

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
6G74 ACCEPTABLE 72/100
+10 points over 4B11T
0 / 100
CAUTION 4B11T Mitsubishi
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE 6G74 Mitsubishi

Specifications

4B11T
6G74
Brand
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi
Verdict
CAUTION
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
62
72
Years
2008--2015
1997--2006
Displacement
1998 cc
3497 cc
Layout
I4
V6
Type
Petrol Turbo
Petrol Na
Power
291--295 hp
203 hp
Known Issues
2
1
Total Risk Cost
€3,200--€9,000
€300--€800

Character

4B11T

"Evo X engine. Strong forged internals. Reliable if maintained to EVO standards. Abused examples suffer."

6G74

"Pajero. GDI direct injection on later variants (problematic). NA MPFI version more reliable. Timing belt. Oil consumption. Adequate torque for Pajero."

Issues Comparison

4B11T 2

▲ HIGH
Ringland failure — modified engines €2,000--€6,000 50,000 km--100,000 km
● MODERATE
Rod bearing wear under hard use €1,200--€3,000 80,000 km--150,000 km

6G74 1

● MODERATE
GDI carbon buildup (DI variants) €300--€800 60,000 km--120,000 km

Models

4B11T 1

Lancer Evolution X CZ 2007--2016 Sedan

6G74 1

Pajero V60/V70 2000--2006
Full 4B11T Report Full 6G74 Report