M271 EVO (CGI turbo) vs M113
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
M113
BEST
89/100
+31 points over M271 EVO (CGI turbo)
0
/ 100
CAUTION
M271 EVO (CGI turbo)
Mercedes-Benz
0
/ 100
BEST
M113
Mercedes-Benz
Specifications
M271 EVO (CGI turbo)
M113
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Mercedes-Benz
Verdict
CAUTION
BEST
Reliability
58
89
Years
2009--2015
1997--2010
Displacement
1796 cc
4966 cc
Layout
I4
V8
Type
Petrol Turbo
Petrol Na
Power
156--204 hp
272--367 hp
Known Issues
3
7
Total Risk Cost
€1,950--€5,500
€1,280--€3,625
Character
M271 EVO (CGI turbo)
"Turbo CGI successor to the Kompressor. Toothed chain fixed the stretch problem, but camshaft adjusters and tensioner wear early — Mercedes extended the adjuster warranty to 10 years in the US. Budget for the timing job."
M113
"The V8 workshops call indestructible. Valve-cover gaskets weep and the crank sensor dies when hot; otherwise 250,000 miles is routine. Supercharged E55 ML (476-500 PS) is a different animal and not covered here."
Issues Comparison
M271 EVO (CGI turbo) 3
◆ CRITICAL
Camshaft adjuster and tensioner wear — timing drift, chain can jump
● MODERATE
Camshaft sensor magnets leak oil into wiring harness and ECU
● MODERATE
Intake-valve carbon build-up (direct injection)
M113 7
▲ HIGH
Harmonic balancer (crank pulley) rubber delaminates
● MODERATE
Oil leaks — valve-cover gaskets, front crank seal (V6), rear main seal (V8)
● MODERATE
Air suspension / Airmatic failure (S/ML models)
○ MINOR
Oil sludge from conventional oil on long FSS intervals (MY1998-2001)
○ MINOR
Crankshaft position sensor fails when hot — stall or hot no-start
○ MINOR
Spark plugs + ignition coils (V6/V8)
○ MINOR
Coolant system: water pump, thermostat, expansion tank