Nu 2.0 GDI (G4NA) vs U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
BUY
80/100
+50 points over Nu 2.0 GDI (G4NA)
0
/ 100
AVOID
Nu 2.0 GDI (G4NA)
Hyundai/Kia
0
/ 100
BUY
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
Hyundai/Kia
Specifications
Nu 2.0 GDI (G4NA)
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
Brand
Hyundai/Kia
Hyundai/Kia
Verdict
AVOID
BUY
Reliability
30
80
Years
2011--2020
2008--2020
Displacement
1999 cc
1582 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Petrol Na
Diesel
Power
154--166 hp
110--136 hp
Known Issues
1
2
Total Risk Cost
€4,000--€15,000
€700--€1,900
Character
Nu 2.0 GDI (G4NA)
"Piston ring defect causes oil consumption and potential engine seizure. Massive recall. Rod bearing failures. Avoid."
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
"Proven diesel. 300k+ km possible. EGR/DPF need highway use. Good for commuters."
Issues Comparison
Nu 2.0 GDI (G4NA) 1
◆ CRITICAL
Rod bearing failure — Engine Litigation II
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB) 2
▲ HIGH
DPF blockage — city use
● MODERATE
EGR valve fouling
Models
Nu 2.0 GDI (G4NA) 2
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB) 50
Getz
i20
Rio
i20
Picanto
Tucson
Ceed
Santa Fe
Cerato
Santa Fe
Sportage
Sportage
Tucson
Sportage
Sportage
i30
Cerato
Stonic
XCeed
Ceed
Ceed
i30
Ceed
Soul
Ceed
i20
Cerato
Soul
i30
Venga
i30
Ceed
XCeed
i30
Ceed
i30
Ceed
i30
Cerato
Ceed
Venga
Rio
i20
Ceed
Rio
i30
i20
Kona 1.6 CRDi
Sportage 1.6 CRDi
Tucson 1.6 CRDi