Nu 2.0 GDI (G4NA) vs U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
BUY
80/100
+50 points over Nu 2.0 GDI (G4NA)
0
/ 100
AVOID
Nu 2.0 GDI (G4NA)
Hyundai/Kia
0
/ 100
BUY
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
Hyundai/Kia
Specifications
Nu 2.0 GDI (G4NA)
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
Brand
Hyundai/Kia
Hyundai/Kia
Verdict
AVOID
BUY
Reliability
30
80
Years
2011--2020
2008--2020
Displacement
1999 cc
1582 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Petrol Na
Diesel
Power
154--166 hp
110--136 hp
Known Issues
1
2
Total Risk Cost
€4,000--€15,000
€700--€1,900
Character
Nu 2.0 GDI (G4NA)
"Piston ring defect causes oil consumption and potential engine seizure. Massive recall. Rod bearing failures. Avoid."
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
"Proven diesel. 300k+ km possible. EGR/DPF need highway use. Good for commuters."
Issues Comparison
Nu 2.0 GDI (G4NA) 1
◆ CRITICAL
Rod bearing failure — Engine Litigation II
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB) 2
▲ HIGH
DPF blockage — city use
● MODERATE
EGR valve fouling
Models
Nu 2.0 GDI (G4NA) 2
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB) 50
Getz
i20
i20
Rio
Picanto
i30
Ceed
Sportage
Santa Fe
Tucson
Sportage
Cerato
Tucson
Sportage
Santa Fe
Sportage
Cerato
i30
Cerato
Ceed
Ceed
Ceed
Ceed
i30
Ceed
Venga
Ceed
Soul
XCeed
i30
Ceed
Stonic
i30
i30
Cerato
XCeed
Ceed
i30
i20
Soul
i20
Ceed
i30
i20
Rio
Venga
Rio
Kona 1.6 CRDi
Sportage 1.6 CRDi
Tucson 1.6 CRDi