Kappa 1.4 (G4LA) vs U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
BUY
80/100
+6 points over Kappa 1.4 (G4LA)
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
Kappa 1.4 (G4LA)
Hyundai/Kia
0
/ 100
BUY
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
Hyundai/Kia
Specifications
Kappa 1.4 (G4LA)
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
Brand
Hyundai/Kia
Hyundai/Kia
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
BUY
Reliability
74
80
Years
2008--2019
2008--2020
Displacement
1248 cc
1582 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Petrol Na
Diesel
Power
84--100 hp
110--136 hp
Known Issues
1
2
Total Risk Cost
€50--€200
€700--€1,900
Character
Kappa 1.4 (G4LA)
"i20/Rio/Picanto. Simple NA engine. Timing chain. No turbo complexity. Coil failures. Thermostat. Reliable city car engine. Low running costs."
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
"Proven diesel. 300k+ km possible. EGR/DPF need highway use. Good for commuters."
Issues Comparison
Kappa 1.4 (G4LA) 1
○ MINOR
Coil pack failure
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB) 2
▲ HIGH
DPF blockage — city use
● MODERATE
EGR valve fouling
Models
Kappa 1.4 (G4LA) 0
No models listed.
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB) 50
Getz
i20
Rio
i20
Picanto
Tucson
Ceed
Santa Fe
Cerato
Santa Fe
Sportage
Sportage
Tucson
Sportage
Sportage
i30
Cerato
Stonic
XCeed
Ceed
Ceed
i30
Ceed
Soul
Ceed
i20
Cerato
Soul
i30
Venga
i30
Ceed
XCeed
i30
Ceed
i30
Ceed
i30
Cerato
Ceed
Venga
Rio
i20
Ceed
Rio
i30
i20
Kona 1.6 CRDi
Sportage 1.6 CRDi
Tucson 1.6 CRDi