G6DP 3.3 V6 TT vs U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
BUY
80/100
+8 points over G6DP 3.3 V6 TT
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
G6DP 3.3 V6 TT
Hyundai/Kia
0
/ 100
BUY
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
Hyundai/Kia
Specifications
G6DP 3.3 V6 TT
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
Brand
Hyundai/Kia
Hyundai/Kia
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
BUY
Reliability
72
80
Years
2017--present
2008--2020
Displacement
3342 cc
1582 cc
Layout
V6
I4
Type
Petrol Turbo
Diesel
Power
370 hp
110--136 hp
Known Issues
1
2
Total Risk Cost
€0--€500
€700--€1,900
Character
G6DP 3.3 V6 TT
"Stinger GT, Genesis. Lambda II twin-turbo. Strong performance. Oil consumption under hard use. Turbo reliable so far. Premium fuel required. Good GT engine."
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
"Proven diesel. 300k+ km possible. EGR/DPF need highway use. Good for commuters."
Issues Comparison
G6DP 3.3 V6 TT 1
● MODERATE
Oil consumption under hard use
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB) 2
▲ HIGH
DPF blockage — city use
● MODERATE
EGR valve fouling
Models
G6DP 3.3 V6 TT 1
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB) 50
Getz
i20
Rio
i20
Picanto
Tucson
Ceed
Santa Fe
Cerato
Santa Fe
Sportage
Sportage
Tucson
Sportage
Sportage
i30
Cerato
Stonic
XCeed
Ceed
Ceed
i30
Ceed
Soul
Ceed
i20
Cerato
Soul
i30
Venga
i30
Ceed
XCeed
i30
Ceed
i30
Ceed
i30
Cerato
Ceed
Venga
Rio
i20
Ceed
Rio
i30
i20
Kona 1.6 CRDi
Sportage 1.6 CRDi
Tucson 1.6 CRDi