Voodoo 5.2 V8 vs EcoBoost 2.0

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
EcoBoost 2.0 ACCEPTABLE 76/100
+4 points over Voodoo 5.2 V8
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE Voodoo 5.2 V8 Ford
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE EcoBoost 2.0 Ford

Specifications

Voodoo 5.2 V8
EcoBoost 2.0
Brand
Ford
Ford
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
72
76
Years
2016--2020
2010--present
Displacement
5163 cc
1999 cc
Layout
V8
I4
Type
Petrol Na
Petrol Turbo
Power
526 hp
200--250 hp
Known Issues
1
0
Total Risk Cost
€0--€1,000
€0--€0

Character

Voodoo 5.2 V8

"Mustang Shelby GT350. Flat-plane crank — Ferrari-like sound from a Ford. Oil consumption by design (track-focused). Some early units had engine tick (valve train). Otherwise very solid."

EcoBoost 2.0

"Focus ST/Mondeo/Kuga. Strong, tunable. Head gasket concern on early Focus ST. Good overall."

Issues Comparison

Voodoo 5.2 V8 1

● MODERATE
Valve train tick (early units) €0--€1,000 20,000 km--80,000 km

EcoBoost 2.0 0

No documented issues.

Models

Voodoo 5.2 V8 1

Mustang S550 2016--2020

EcoBoost 2.0 13

Focus Mk1 (DAW) 2002--2004 Mondeo Mk4 (BA7) 2007--2014 Focus Mk1 (DAW) 2002--2003 Focus Mk3 (DYB) 2012--2018 Mondeo Mk4 (BA7) 2007--2014 Mondeo Mk4 (BA7) 2010--2014 Mondeo Mk5 (CD391) 2015--2022 Galaxy Mk3 (CD390) 2015--2023 S-Max Mk2 (CD390) 2015--2023 Mondeo Mk5 (CD391) 2015--2019 Mondeo Mk4 (BA7) 2010--2014 Focus ST 2.0 EcoBoost DYB 2012--2018 Hatchback Kuga 2.0 EcoBoost CBS 2012--2019 SUV
Full Voodoo 5.2 V8 Report Full EcoBoost 2.0 Report