EcoBoost 2.0 vs Sigma 1.4

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Reliability score
Tied 76/100
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE EcoBoost 2.0 Ford
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE Sigma 1.4 Ford

Specifications

EcoBoost 2.0
Sigma 1.4
Brand
Ford
Ford
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
76
76
Years
2010--present
2001--2012
Displacement
1999 cc
1388 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Petrol Turbo
Petrol Na
Power
200--250 hp
75--96 hp
Known Issues
0
1
Total Risk Cost
€0--€0
€50--€200

Character

EcoBoost 2.0

"Focus ST/Mondeo/Kuga. Strong, tunable. Head gasket concern on early Focus ST. Good overall."

Sigma 1.4

"Fiesta/Fusion. Same Sigma family as 1.25. Timing chain. Thermostat. Coil pack. Slightly more power than 1.25 for minimal cost increase. Reliable city car."

Issues Comparison

EcoBoost 2.0 0

No documented issues.

Sigma 1.4 1

○ MINOR
Coil pack failure €50--€200 40,000 km--80,000 km

Models

EcoBoost 2.0 13

Focus Mk1 (DAW) 2002--2004 Mondeo Mk4 (BA7) 2007--2014 Focus Mk1 (DAW) 2002--2003 Focus Mk3 (DYB) 2012--2018 Mondeo Mk4 (BA7) 2007--2014 Mondeo Mk4 (BA7) 2010--2014 Mondeo Mk5 (CD391) 2015--2022 Galaxy Mk3 (CD390) 2015--2023 S-Max Mk2 (CD390) 2015--2023 Mondeo Mk5 (CD391) 2015--2019 Mondeo Mk4 (BA7) 2010--2014 Focus ST 2.0 EcoBoost DYB 2012--2018 Hatchback Kuga 2.0 EcoBoost CBS 2012--2019 SUV

Sigma 1.4 3

Focus Mk1 (DAW) 1998--2004 Fiesta Mk6 (JD/JH) 2002--2008 Fiesta Mk7 (JA8) 2008--2012
Full EcoBoost 2.0 Report Full Sigma 1.4 Report