Duratorq 3.2 TDCi vs EcoBoost 2.0

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
EcoBoost 2.0 ACCEPTABLE 76/100
+6 points over Duratorq 3.2 TDCi
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE Duratorq 3.2 TDCi Ford
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE EcoBoost 2.0 Ford

Specifications

Duratorq 3.2 TDCi
EcoBoost 2.0
Brand
Ford
Ford
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
70
76
Years
2006--2016
2010--present
Displacement
3198 cc
1999 cc
Layout
I5
I4
Type
Diesel
Petrol Turbo
Power
200 hp
200--250 hp
Known Issues
1
0
Total Risk Cost
€500--€1,200
€0--€0

Character

Duratorq 3.2 TDCi

"Transit/Ranger. Ford I5 diesel. Robust commercial engine. Timing gear driven. Injector issues at high mileage. DMF. Good torque for towing. Well-understood in workshops."

EcoBoost 2.0

"Focus ST/Mondeo/Kuga. Strong, tunable. Head gasket concern on early Focus ST. Good overall."

Issues Comparison

Duratorq 3.2 TDCi 1

▲ HIGH
Dual-mass flywheel €500--€1,200 80,000 km--150,000 km

EcoBoost 2.0 0

No documented issues.

Models

Duratorq 3.2 TDCi 1

Ranger T6 2011--2022

EcoBoost 2.0 13

Focus Mk1 (DAW) 2002--2004 Mondeo Mk4 (BA7) 2007--2014 Focus Mk1 (DAW) 2002--2003 Focus Mk3 (DYB) 2012--2018 Mondeo Mk4 (BA7) 2007--2014 Mondeo Mk4 (BA7) 2010--2014 Mondeo Mk5 (CD391) 2015--2022 Galaxy Mk3 (CD390) 2015--2023 S-Max Mk2 (CD390) 2015--2023 Mondeo Mk5 (CD391) 2015--2019 Mondeo Mk4 (BA7) 2010--2014 Focus ST 2.0 EcoBoost DYB 2012--2018 Hatchback Kuga 2.0 EcoBoost CBS 2012--2019 SUV
Full Duratorq 3.2 TDCi Report Full EcoBoost 2.0 Report