Duratorq 3.2 TDCi vs Duratec 2.0

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
Duratec 2.0 BEST 88/100
+18 points over Duratorq 3.2 TDCi
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE Duratorq 3.2 TDCi Ford
0 / 100
BEST Duratec 2.0 Ford

Specifications

Duratorq 3.2 TDCi
Duratec 2.0
Brand
Ford
Ford
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
BEST
Reliability
70
88
Years
2006--2016
2001--2018
Displacement
3198 cc
1999 cc
Layout
I5
I4
Type
Diesel
Petrol Na
Power
200 hp
130--145 hp
Known Issues
1
2
Total Risk Cost
€500--€1,200
€550--€1,150

Character

Duratorq 3.2 TDCi

"Transit/Ranger. Ford I5 diesel. Robust commercial engine. Timing gear driven. Injector issues at high mileage. DMF. Good torque for towing. Well-understood in workshops."

Duratec 2.0

"Focus/Mondeo/Mazda3 shared. Mazda MZR co-developed. Simple, proven, nearly bulletproof. 300k+ km. The reliable Ford."

Issues Comparison

Duratorq 3.2 TDCi 1

▲ HIGH
Dual-mass flywheel €500--€1,200 80,000 km--150,000 km

Duratec 2.0 2

○ MINOR
Coolant system maintenance (age) €150--€350 100,000 km--180,000 km
○ MINOR
Timing chain (long life, minor at high mileage) €400--€800 150,000 km--∞

Models

Duratorq 3.2 TDCi 1

Ranger T6 2011--2022

Duratec 2.0 5

Mondeo Mk3 (B5Y) 2000--2007 Focus Mk1 (DAW) 1998--2004 Fiesta Mk6 (JD/JH) 2005--2008 Mondeo 2.0 Duratec B5Y 2000--2007 Sedan Mondeo 2.0 Duratec BA7 2007--2014 Sedan
Full Duratorq 3.2 TDCi Report Full Duratec 2.0 Report