Duratorq 3.0 TDCi vs EcoBoost 2.0

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
EcoBoost 2.0 ACCEPTABLE 76/100
+18 points over Duratorq 3.0 TDCi
0 / 100
CAUTION Duratorq 3.0 TDCi Ford
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE EcoBoost 2.0 Ford

Specifications

Duratorq 3.0 TDCi
EcoBoost 2.0
Brand
Ford
Ford
Verdict
CAUTION
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
58
76
Years
2006--2014
2010--present
Displacement
2996 cc
1999 cc
Layout
V6
I4
Type
Diesel
Petrol Turbo
Power
240--250 hp
200--250 hp
Known Issues
2
0
Total Risk Cost
€1,800--€5,500
€0--€0

Character

Duratorq 3.0 TDCi

"Mondeo/S-MAX, also Ranger Raptor. PSA/Ford/Jaguar V6 diesel (same as psa_27_hdi_v6 family). Timing chain. Turbo failure. Expensive injectors. Complex cooling. Specialist only."

EcoBoost 2.0

"Focus ST/Mondeo/Kuga. Strong, tunable. Head gasket concern on early Focus ST. Good overall."

Issues Comparison

Duratorq 3.0 TDCi 2

▲ HIGH
Turbo failure (V6 diesel) €800--€2,500 80,000 km--150,000 km
▲ HIGH
Timing chain concerns €1,000--€3,000 100,000 km--180,000 km

EcoBoost 2.0 0

No documented issues.

Models

Duratorq 3.0 TDCi 1

Ranger P703 2022--present

EcoBoost 2.0 13

Focus Mk1 (DAW) 2002--2004 Mondeo Mk4 (BA7) 2007--2014 Focus Mk1 (DAW) 2002--2003 Focus Mk3 (DYB) 2012--2018 Mondeo Mk4 (BA7) 2007--2014 Mondeo Mk4 (BA7) 2010--2014 Mondeo Mk5 (CD391) 2015--2022 Galaxy Mk3 (CD390) 2015--2023 S-Max Mk2 (CD390) 2015--2023 Mondeo Mk5 (CD391) 2015--2019 Mondeo Mk4 (BA7) 2010--2014 Focus ST 2.0 EcoBoost DYB 2012--2018 Hatchback Kuga 2.0 EcoBoost CBS 2012--2019 SUV
Full Duratorq 3.0 TDCi Report Full EcoBoost 2.0 Report