Duratorq 2.2 TDCi vs Coyote 5.0 V8

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
Coyote 5.0 V8 BUY 82/100
+14 points over Duratorq 2.2 TDCi
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE Duratorq 2.2 TDCi Ford
0 / 100
BUY Coyote 5.0 V8 Ford

Specifications

Duratorq 2.2 TDCi
Coyote 5.0 V8
Brand
Ford
Ford
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
BUY
Reliability
68
82
Years
2006--2018
2015--present
Displacement
2198 cc
4951 cc
Layout
I4
V8
Type
Diesel
Petrol Na
Power
125--200 hp
421--507 hp
Known Issues
2
2
Total Risk Cost
€900--€2,400
€500--€2,500

Character

Duratorq 2.2 TDCi

"Mondeo/Transit/Ranger. Ford-Peugeot DW12-based. Timing chain. Injector issues. DMF. DPF on later models. Workhorse diesel for Transit vans. Good parts support."

Coyote 5.0 V8

"Mustang GT. Modern pushrod-free DOHC V8. Ti-VCT dual variable timing. Exceptionally reliable for a performance V8. Oil consumption on track use. No known catastrophic weaknesses."

Issues Comparison

Duratorq 2.2 TDCi 2

▲ HIGH
Dual-mass flywheel €500--€1,200 80,000 km--150,000 km
▲ HIGH
Injector failure €400--€1,200 120,000 km--200,000 km

Coyote 5.0 V8 2

● MODERATE
Timing chain/phaser tick (Gen 1) €500--€2,000 80,000 km--150,000 km
○ MINOR
Oil consumption on track use €0--€500 40,000 km--100,000 km

Models

Duratorq 2.2 TDCi 4

Ranger T6 2011--2022 Mondeo Mk4 (BA7) 2008--2014 Mondeo Mk4 (BA7) 2010--2014 Mondeo Mk3 (B5Y) 2004--2007

Coyote 5.0 V8 3

Mustang S550 2015--2023 Mustang S650 2024--present Mustang S650 2024--present
Full Duratorq 2.2 TDCi Report Full Coyote 5.0 V8 Report