2.2 TDCi Duratorq Puma (ZSD-422) vs EcoBoost 2.0
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
EcoBoost 2.0
BUY
78/100
+14 points over 2.2 TDCi Duratorq Puma (ZSD-422)
0
/ 100
CAUTION
2.2 TDCi Duratorq Puma (ZSD-422)
Ford
0
/ 100
BUY
EcoBoost 2.0
Ford
Specifications
2.2 TDCi Duratorq Puma (ZSD-422)
EcoBoost 2.0
Brand
Ford
Ford
Verdict
CAUTION
BUY
Reliability
64
78
Years
2004--2021
2010--present
Displacement
2198 cc
1999 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Diesel
Petrol Turbo
Power
85--155 hp
200--250 hp
Known Issues
6
2
Total Risk Cost
€0--€0
€0--€0
Character
2.2 TDCi Duratorq Puma (ZSD-422)
"Ford's own 2.2 diesel with a timing chain, used in the Transit and Transit Custom, the Ranger T6, the Mondeo Mk3 2.2 TDCi and the Peugeot Boxer / Citroen Jumper. Tough and simple, but 2006-2010 engines had troublesome Delphi injectors, the Ranger's variable oil pump and EGR cooler can wreck the engine if ignored, and the DPF dilutes the oil on short runs. Check the coolant level and service history."
EcoBoost 2.0
"Ford's 2.0 turbo four in the Mondeo, S-Max, Galaxy, Kuga and Focus ST. Strong and tunable, but cars built before the mid-2019 block revision can crack the block and let coolant into a cylinder - white smoke, misfire, coolant loss and an engine swap. Check the expansion tank and a cold start before buying."
Issues Comparison
2.2 TDCi Duratorq Puma (ZSD-422) 6
▲ HIGH
Delphi injector faults (2006-2010) - hunting idle, piston damage
▲ HIGH
EGR cooler internal coolant leak (Ranger)
▲ HIGH
Oil pump failure or loss of prime (Ranger) - engine damage risk
● MODERATE
DPF fuel dilution - rising oil level
○ MINOR
EGR valve faults
○ MINOR
Crankshaft damper pulley failure (Transit)
EcoBoost 2.0 2
◆ CRITICAL
Coolant intrusion into a cylinder - hairline crack in the block (pre mid-2019)
○ MINOR
Carbon build-up on intake valves and injectors (direct injection)