2.2 TDCi Duratorq Puma (ZSD-422) vs 1.8 TDDi / DI (Endura-DI)
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
1.8 TDDi / DI (Endura-DI)
BUY
84/100
+20 points over 2.2 TDCi Duratorq Puma (ZSD-422)
0
/ 100
CAUTION
2.2 TDCi Duratorq Puma (ZSD-422)
Ford
0
/ 100
BUY
1.8 TDDi / DI (Endura-DI)
Ford
Specifications
2.2 TDCi Duratorq Puma (ZSD-422)
1.8 TDDi / DI (Endura-DI)
Brand
Ford
Ford
Verdict
CAUTION
BUY
Reliability
64
84
Years
2004--2021
1998--2004
Displacement
2198 cc
1753 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Diesel
Diesel
Power
85--155 hp
75--90 hp
Known Issues
6
1
Total Risk Cost
€0--€0
€0--€0
Character
2.2 TDCi Duratorq Puma (ZSD-422)
"Ford's own 2.2 diesel with a timing chain, used in the Transit and Transit Custom, the Ranger T6, the Mondeo Mk3 2.2 TDCi and the Peugeot Boxer / Citroen Jumper. Tough and simple, but 2006-2010 engines had troublesome Delphi injectors, the Ranger's variable oil pump and EGR cooler can wreck the engine if ignored, and the DPF dilutes the oil on short runs. Check the coolant level and service history."
1.8 TDDi / DI (Endura-DI)
"Pre-common-rail Ford 1.8 diesel (Focus Mk1 TDDi 75/90 hp, Fiesta Mk4 1.8 DI). Direct injection with an electronically controlled rotary pump. Owners rate it far better than the later 1.8 TDCi; the injection pump and its control unit are the one known weak point, typically after 120,000 km."
Issues Comparison
2.2 TDCi Duratorq Puma (ZSD-422) 6
▲ HIGH
Delphi injector faults (2006-2010) - hunting idle, piston damage
▲ HIGH
EGR cooler internal coolant leak (Ranger)
▲ HIGH
Oil pump failure or loss of prime (Ranger) - engine damage risk
● MODERATE
DPF fuel dilution - rising oil level
○ MINOR
EGR valve faults
○ MINOR
Crankshaft damper pulley failure (Transit)
1.8 TDDi / DI (Endura-DI) 1
▲ HIGH
Injection pump control unit failure