2.0 EcoBlue 210 vs Sigma 1.25

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
Sigma 1.25 BUY 78/100
+8 points over 2.0 EcoBlue 210
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE 2.0 EcoBlue 210 Ford
0 / 100
BUY Sigma 1.25 Ford

Specifications

2.0 EcoBlue 210
Sigma 1.25
Brand
Ford
Ford
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
BUY
Reliability
70
78
Years
2018--present
1996--2017
Displacement
1997 cc
1242 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Diesel
Petrol Na
Power
210 hp
60--82 hp
Known Issues
1
1
Total Risk Cost
€400--€1,500
€50--€150

Character

2.0 EcoBlue 210

"Mondeo/S-MAX top diesel. PSA DW10 latest evolution. Twin-turbo. DPF/SCR. Most powerful 2.0 diesel variant. Good motorway cruiser. Same DPF city concerns."

Sigma 1.25

"Fiesta/Ka. Simple Yamaha co-developed engine. Timing chain (good). Reliable. Low power. Thermostat housing. Coil pack. Perfect first car/city car engine."

Issues Comparison

2.0 EcoBlue 210 1

● MODERATE
DPF/SCR complexity €400--€1,500 60,000 km--120,000 km

Sigma 1.25 1

○ MINOR
Thermostat housing crack €50--€150 60,000 km--120,000 km

Models

2.0 EcoBlue 210 2

Ranger P703 2022--present Mondeo Mk5 (CD391) 2015--2019

Sigma 1.25 3

Fiesta Mk6 (JD/JH) 2002--2008 Fiesta Mk7 (JA8) 2008--2017 Fiesta Mk7 (JA8) 2008--2017
Full 2.0 EcoBlue 210 Report Full Sigma 1.25 Report