2.0 GME Turbo vs 2.9 V6 Biturbo

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
2.0 GME Turbo ACCEPTABLE 72/100
+4 points over 2.9 V6 Biturbo
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE 2.0 GME Turbo Alfa Romeo
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE 2.9 V6 Biturbo Alfa Romeo

Specifications

2.0 GME Turbo
2.9 V6 Biturbo
Brand
Alfa Romeo
Alfa Romeo
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
72
68
Years
2016--present
2016--2023
Displacement
1995 cc
2891 cc
Layout
I4
V6
Type
Petrol Turbo
Petrol Turbo
Power
200--280 hp
510 hp
Known Issues
3
0
Total Risk Cost
€950--€3,100
€0--€0

Character

2.0 GME Turbo

"Giulia/Stelvio heart. FCA-developed, strong output. Oil consumption reports early on but improving with updates."

2.9 V6 Biturbo

"Quadrifoglio engine. Ferrari-derived. Incredible but expensive maintenance. Not for neglect."

Issues Comparison

2.0 GME Turbo 3

▲ HIGH
Electrical/ECU system faults €500--€2,000 0 km--∞
● MODERATE
Battery drain / management issues €150--€500 0 km--80,000 km
● MODERATE
Turbo O-ring oil leak €300--€600 50,000 km--100,000 km

2.9 V6 Biturbo 0

No documented issues.

Models

2.0 GME Turbo 3

Cherokee 2.0T KL 2013--2022 SUV Giulia 2.0 GME T4 952 2016--2024 Sedan Stelvio 2.0 GME T4 949 2017--2024 SUV

2.9 V6 Biturbo 7

Stelvio 949 2017--present Giulia 952 2016--present Giulia 952 2017--present Stelvio 949 2017--present Giulia 952 2016--present Giulia 952 2016--present Stelvio 949 2018--present
Full 2.0 GME Turbo Report Full 2.9 V6 Biturbo Report