M160/M160E vs M135 1.3/1.5
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
M135 1.3/1.5
ACCEPTABLE
72/100
+32 points over M160/M160E
0
/ 100
AVOID
M160/M160E
Smart
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
M135 1.3/1.5
Smart
Specifications
M160/M160E
M135 1.3/1.5
Brand
Smart
Smart
Verdict
AVOID
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
40
72
Years
1998--2007
2014--2019
Displacement
599 cc
1332 cc
Layout
I3
I4
Type
Petrol Turbo
Petrol Na
Power
45--61 hp
71--109 hp
Known Issues
5
2
Total Risk Cost
€2,200--€5,700
€300--€1,200
Character
M160/M160E
"Original Smart engine. Tiny, turbocharged, temperamental. Clutch actuator = wallet killer. Fun when it works."
M135 1.3/1.5
"ForTwo/ForFour 453. Mitsubishi 3A9 engine (Mirage/Space Star). NA 1.0 (71hp) and 1.3 (109hp). Brabus 1.5 turbo (177hp) rare. Simple, reliable for what it is. Timing chain. CVT on ForTwo can be jerky. Better than old M132."
Issues Comparison
M160/M160E 5
◆ CRITICAL
Clutch actuator failure
◆ CRITICAL
Head gasket failure
▲ HIGH
Overheating (rear-mount cooling)
▲ HIGH
Turbo failure
● MODERATE
ECU / immobilizer fault
M135 1.3/1.5 2
● MODERATE
CVT jerkiness (ForTwo)
● MODERATE
Timing chain tensioner wear