R9M vs K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
BUY
78/100
+14 points over R9M
0
/ 100
CAUTION
R9M
Renault
0
/ 100
BUY
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
Renault
Specifications
R9M
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
Brand
Renault
Renault
Verdict
CAUTION
BUY
Reliability
64
78
Years
2011--2020
2010--2020
Displacement
1598 cc
1461 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Diesel
Diesel
Power
130--163 hp
75--110 hp
Known Issues
2
3
Total Risk Cost
€1,300--€3,500
€1,300--€3,100
Character
R9M
"Kadjar/Scenic/Talisman. Renault-Nissan co-developed. Timing chain (good). But DPF problems in city use, EGR failures, injector issues. Some reports of premature timing chain wear."
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
"Revised K9K. Improved turbo and injectors. Still Europes most common small diesel. Proven long-distance."
Issues Comparison
R9M 2
▲ HIGH
DPF blockage in city use
▲ HIGH
Premature timing chain wear
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010) 3
▲ HIGH
Timing belt — INTERFERENCE ENGINE (critical)
● MODERATE
EGR fouling + DPF (city use)
● MODERATE
Turbocharger wear at high mileage
Models
R9M 0
No models listed.