K4M vs K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
BUY
78/100
+2 points over K4M
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
K4M
Renault
0
/ 100
BUY
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
Renault
Specifications
K4M
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
Brand
Renault
Renault
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
BUY
Reliability
76
78
Years
1999--2017
2010--2020
Displacement
1598 cc
1461 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Petrol Na
Diesel
Power
95--115 hp
75--110 hp
Known Issues
2
3
Total Risk Cost
€350--€800
€1,300--€3,100
Character
K4M
"Megane/Scenic/Clio workhorse. Phase variable timing. Reliable with maintenance. Coil pack failures. Thermostat housing. Timing belt (interference) — replacement critical."
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010)
"Revised K9K. Improved turbo and injectors. Still Europes most common small diesel. Proven long-distance."
Issues Comparison
K4M 2
▲ HIGH
Timing belt (interference)
○ MINOR
Coil pack failure
K9K 1.5 dCi (post-2010) 3
▲ HIGH
Timing belt — INTERFERENCE ENGINE (critical)
● MODERATE
EGR fouling + DPF (city use)
● MODERATE
Turbocharger wear at high mileage
Models
K4M 0
No models listed.