DT17 2.7 HDi V6 vs XU10 2.0

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
XU10 2.0 ACCEPTABLE 74/100
+26 points over DT17 2.7 HDi V6
0 / 100
CAUTION DT17 2.7 HDi V6 PSA
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE XU10 2.0 PSA

Specifications

DT17 2.7 HDi V6
XU10 2.0
Brand
PSA
PSA
Verdict
CAUTION
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
48
74
Years
2005--2011
1992--2002
Displacement
2720 cc
1998 cc
Layout
V6
I4
Type
Diesel
Petrol Na
Power
204 hp
132--167 hp
Known Issues
2
1
Total Risk Cost
€1,800--€5,500
€250--€500

Character

DT17 2.7 HDi V6

"407/607/C5/C6. Ford-PSA-Jaguar co-developed V6 diesel (same as Jaguar/Land Rover 2.7 TDV6). Turbo failure. Injector issues. DPF. Timing chain. Complex and expensive to maintain."

XU10 2.0

"405/406/Xantia. Older XU family — cast iron block. Turbo 16V version (RFS) in 405 T16. Timing belt. Head gasket on turbo variants. Simple, proven, cheap parts. RFS turbo is a classic."

Issues Comparison

DT17 2.7 HDi V6 2

▲ HIGH
Turbo failure €800--€2,500 80,000 km--150,000 km
▲ HIGH
Timing chain issues €1,000--€3,000 100,000 km--180,000 km

XU10 2.0 1

▲ HIGH
Timing belt (interference) €250--€500 60,000 km--90,000 km

Models

DT17 2.7 HDi V6 1

607 9D/9U 2005--2010

XU10 2.0 5

206 T1 1999--2007 206 2A/C 1999--2006 406 — 1996--2004 306 N3/N5 1993--2002 306 N3/N5 1994--2002
Full DT17 2.7 HDi V6 Report Full XU10 2.0 Report