1.6 Turbo (A16LET/B16SHT) vs C20XE/X20XEV 2.0
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
C20XE/X20XEV 2.0
BUY
78/100
+20 points over 1.6 Turbo (A16LET/B16SHT)
0
/ 100
CAUTION
1.6 Turbo (A16LET/B16SHT)
Opel
0
/ 100
BUY
C20XE/X20XEV 2.0
Opel
Specifications
1.6 Turbo (A16LET/B16SHT)
C20XE/X20XEV 2.0
Brand
Opel
Opel
Verdict
CAUTION
BUY
Reliability
58
78
Years
2007--2018
1991--2005
Displacement
1598 cc
1998 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Petrol Turbo
Petrol Na
Power
170--200 hp
136--150 hp
Known Issues
6
1
Total Risk Cost
€3,100--€7,400
€250--€500
Character
1.6 Turbo (A16LET/B16SHT)
"A16LET is the problem child — timing chain, turbo, HPFP. Later B16SHT much better. Service history essential."
C20XE/X20XEV 2.0
"Astra F/G, Vectra A/B, Calibra. C20XE = red top legend (16V). X20XEV = Ecotec successor. Timing belt (C20XE) or chain (X20XEV). C20XE is one of Opel's great performance engines. Reliable with care."
Issues Comparison
1.6 Turbo (A16LET/B16SHT) 6
◆ CRITICAL
Timing chain stretch + tensioner failure
▲ HIGH
High-pressure fuel pump failure
▲ HIGH
Turbocharger failure
● MODERATE
Ignition coil failure under boost
● MODERATE
Carbon buildup (direct injection)
● MODERATE
Water pump failure
C20XE/X20XEV 2.0 1
▲ HIGH
Timing belt (C20XE)