1.0 Turbo (B10XFT) vs X10XE/Z10XE 1.0
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
X10XE/Z10XE 1.0
ACCEPTABLE
76/100
+10 points over 1.0 Turbo (B10XFT)
0
/ 100
CAUTION
1.0 Turbo (B10XFT)
Opel
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
X10XE/Z10XE 1.0
Opel
Specifications
1.0 Turbo (B10XFT)
X10XE/Z10XE 1.0
Brand
Opel
Opel
Verdict
CAUTION
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
66
76
Years
2014--2019
1996--2006
Displacement
999 cc
998 cc
Layout
I3
I3
Type
Petrol Turbo
Petrol Na
Power
90--115 hp
54--60 hp
Known Issues
5
1
Total Risk Cost
€1,330--€2,950
€200--€500
Character
1.0 Turbo (B10XFT)
"3-cylinder city turbo. Thermostat epidemic is the Achilles heel. Adequate power for Corsa weight. Check service history."
X10XE/Z10XE 1.0
"Corsa B/C, Agila. 3-cylinder. Simple, fuel efficient. Head gasket can weep at high mileage. Timing chain. Low power but cheap and reliable city car engine."
Issues Comparison
1.0 Turbo (B10XFT) 5
● MODERATE
Thermostat failure (epidemic)
● MODERATE
Timing chain stretch (3-cylinder stress)
○ MINOR
Engine mount wear (3-cyl vibration)
○ MINOR
Ignition coil failure
○ MINOR
Turbo wastegate rattle
X10XE/Z10XE 1.0 1
● MODERATE
Head gasket weep