4D68T vs 4G13

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
4G13 BUY 78/100
+8 points over 4D68T
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE 4D68T Mitsubishi
0 / 100
BUY 4G13 Mitsubishi

Specifications

4D68T
4G13
Brand
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
BUY
Reliability
70
78
Years
1995--2003
1996--2008
Displacement
1998 cc
1298 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Diesel
Petrol Na
Power
90 hp
75--82 hp
Known Issues
1
1
Total Risk Cost
€200--€400
€200--€400

Character

4D68T

"Space Star/Carisma. Old indirect injection diesel. Timing belt. Simple. No common rail complexity. Economical. Glow plug failures. Adequate for the era."

4G13

"Colt/Lancer. Simple OHC. Timing belt. Reliable city car engine. Low maintenance. Oil consumption at high mileage. Nothing exciting but dependable."

Issues Comparison

4D68T 1

▲ HIGH
Timing belt €200--€400 60,000 km--90,000 km

4G13 1

▲ HIGH
Timing belt (interference) €200--€400 60,000 km--90,000 km

Models

4D68T 1

Galant EA 1997--2000

4G13 1

Lancer CS 2000--2007
Full 4D68T Report Full 4G13 Report