4B11T vs 4B12

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
4B12 ACCEPTABLE 72/100
+10 points over 4B11T
0 / 100
CAUTION 4B11T Mitsubishi
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE 4B12 Mitsubishi

Specifications

4B11T
4B12
Brand
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi
Verdict
CAUTION
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
62
72
Years
2008--2015
2007--2020
Displacement
1998 cc
2360 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Petrol Turbo
Petrol Na
Power
291--295 hp
168--170 hp
Known Issues
2
1
Total Risk Cost
€3,200--€9,000
€400--€800

Character

4B11T

"Evo X engine. Strong forged internals. Reliable if maintained to EVO standards. Abused examples suffer."

4B12

"Outlander/ASX 2.4. Bigger bore 4B11. Adequate SUV power. Chain-driven. No major issues known."

Issues Comparison

4B11T 2

▲ HIGH
Ringland failure — modified engines €2,000--€6,000 50,000 km--100,000 km
● MODERATE
Rod bearing wear under hard use €1,200--€3,000 80,000 km--150,000 km

4B12 1

○ MINOR
Timing chain €400--€800 150,000 km--∞

Models

4B11T 1

Lancer Evolution X CZ 2007--2016 Sedan

4B12 3

Galant EA 1997--2004 Outlander GF/GG 2013--2021 Outlander 2.4 MIVEC GF 2012--2021 SUV
Full 4B11T Report Full 4B12 Report