Nu 2.0 GDI (G4NA) vs G6DH 3.5 V6

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
G6DH 3.5 V6 ACCEPTABLE 75/100
+45 points over Nu 2.0 GDI (G4NA)
0 / 100
AVOID Nu 2.0 GDI (G4NA) Hyundai/Kia
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE G6DH 3.5 V6 Hyundai/Kia

Specifications

Nu 2.0 GDI (G4NA)
G6DH 3.5 V6
Brand
Hyundai/Kia
Hyundai/Kia
Verdict
AVOID
ACCEPTABLE
Reliability
30
75
Years
2011--2020
2020--present
Displacement
1999 cc
3470 cc
Layout
I4
V6
Type
Petrol Na
Petrol Na
Power
154--166 hp
272--300 hp
Known Issues
1
1
Total Risk Cost
€4,000--€15,000
€0--€0

Character

Nu 2.0 GDI (G4NA)

"Piston ring defect causes oil consumption and potential engine seizure. Massive recall. Rod bearing failures. Avoid."

G6DH 3.5 V6

"Genesis G80/GV70. Latest Lambda V6. NA or twin-turbo (3.5T). Chain driven. Too new for long-term data. No known pattern failures. Refined luxury V6."

Issues Comparison

Nu 2.0 GDI (G4NA) 1

◆ CRITICAL
Rod bearing failure — Engine Litigation II €4,000--€15,000 50,000 km--130,000 km

G6DH 3.5 V6 1

○ MINOR
Too new for pattern failures €0--€0 0 km--0 km

Models

Nu 2.0 GDI (G4NA) 2

Tucson TL 2015--2021 Sportage 2.0 GDI QL 2015--2021 SUV

G6DH 3.5 V6 1

Carnival KA4 2021--present
Full Nu 2.0 GDI (G4NA) Report Full G6DH 3.5 V6 Report