Kappa 1.4 (G4LA) vs U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
BUY
80/100
+6 points over Kappa 1.4 (G4LA)
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
Kappa 1.4 (G4LA)
Hyundai/Kia
0
/ 100
BUY
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
Hyundai/Kia
Specifications
Kappa 1.4 (G4LA)
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
Brand
Hyundai/Kia
Hyundai/Kia
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
BUY
Reliability
74
80
Years
2008--2019
2008--2020
Displacement
1248 cc
1582 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Petrol Na
Diesel
Power
84--100 hp
110--136 hp
Known Issues
1
2
Total Risk Cost
€50--€200
€700--€1,900
Character
Kappa 1.4 (G4LA)
"i20/Rio/Picanto. Simple NA engine. Timing chain. No turbo complexity. Coil failures. Thermostat. Reliable city car engine. Low running costs."
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB)
"Proven diesel. 300k+ km possible. EGR/DPF need highway use. Good for commuters."
Issues Comparison
Kappa 1.4 (G4LA) 1
○ MINOR
Coil pack failure
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB) 2
▲ HIGH
DPF blockage — city use
● MODERATE
EGR valve fouling
Models
Kappa 1.4 (G4LA) 0
No models listed.
U/U2 1.6 CRDi (D4FB) 50
Getz
i20
i20
Rio
Picanto
i30
Ceed
Sportage
Santa Fe
Tucson
Sportage
Cerato
Tucson
Sportage
Santa Fe
Sportage
Cerato
i30
Cerato
Ceed
Ceed
Ceed
Ceed
i30
Ceed
Venga
Ceed
Soul
XCeed
i30
Ceed
Stonic
i30
i30
Cerato
XCeed
Ceed
i30
i20
Soul
i20
Ceed
i30
i20
Rio
Venga
Rio
Kona 1.6 CRDi
Sportage 1.6 CRDi
Tucson 1.6 CRDi