Duratorq 3.2 TDCi vs Coyote 5.0 V8
Side-by-side reliability comparison
Higher reliability score
Coyote 5.0 V8
BUY
82/100
+12 points over Duratorq 3.2 TDCi
0
/ 100
ACCEPTABLE
Duratorq 3.2 TDCi
Ford
0
/ 100
BUY
Coyote 5.0 V8
Ford
Specifications
Duratorq 3.2 TDCi
Coyote 5.0 V8
Brand
Ford
Ford
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
BUY
Reliability
70
82
Years
2006--2016
2015--present
Displacement
3198 cc
4951 cc
Layout
I5
V8
Type
Diesel
Petrol Na
Power
200 hp
421--507 hp
Known Issues
1
2
Total Risk Cost
€500--€1,200
€500--€2,500
Character
Duratorq 3.2 TDCi
"Transit/Ranger. Ford I5 diesel. Robust commercial engine. Timing gear driven. Injector issues at high mileage. DMF. Good torque for towing. Well-understood in workshops."
Coyote 5.0 V8
"Mustang GT. Modern pushrod-free DOHC V8. Ti-VCT dual variable timing. Exceptionally reliable for a performance V8. Oil consumption on track use. No known catastrophic weaknesses."
Issues Comparison
Duratorq 3.2 TDCi 1
▲ HIGH
Dual-mass flywheel
Coyote 5.0 V8 2
● MODERATE
Timing chain/phaser tick (Gen 1)
○ MINOR
Oil consumption on track use