Duratorq 2.2 TDCi vs Duratec 2.0

Side-by-side reliability comparison

Higher reliability score
Duratec 2.0 BEST 88/100
+20 points over Duratorq 2.2 TDCi
0 / 100
ACCEPTABLE Duratorq 2.2 TDCi Ford
0 / 100
BEST Duratec 2.0 Ford

Specifications

Duratorq 2.2 TDCi
Duratec 2.0
Brand
Ford
Ford
Verdict
ACCEPTABLE
BEST
Reliability
68
88
Years
2006--2018
2001--2018
Displacement
2198 cc
1999 cc
Layout
I4
I4
Type
Diesel
Petrol Na
Power
125--200 hp
130--145 hp
Known Issues
2
2
Total Risk Cost
€900--€2,400
€550--€1,150

Character

Duratorq 2.2 TDCi

"Mondeo/Transit/Ranger. Ford-Peugeot DW12-based. Timing chain. Injector issues. DMF. DPF on later models. Workhorse diesel for Transit vans. Good parts support."

Duratec 2.0

"Focus/Mondeo/Mazda3 shared. Mazda MZR co-developed. Simple, proven, nearly bulletproof. 300k+ km. The reliable Ford."

Issues Comparison

Duratorq 2.2 TDCi 2

▲ HIGH
Dual-mass flywheel €500--€1,200 80,000 km--150,000 km
▲ HIGH
Injector failure €400--€1,200 120,000 km--200,000 km

Duratec 2.0 2

○ MINOR
Coolant system maintenance (age) €150--€350 100,000 km--180,000 km
○ MINOR
Timing chain (long life, minor at high mileage) €400--€800 150,000 km--∞

Models

Duratorq 2.2 TDCi 4

Ranger T6 2011--2022 Mondeo Mk4 (BA7) 2008--2014 Mondeo Mk4 (BA7) 2010--2014 Mondeo Mk3 (B5Y) 2004--2007

Duratec 2.0 5

Mondeo Mk3 (B5Y) 2000--2007 Focus Mk1 (DAW) 1998--2004 Fiesta Mk6 (JD/JH) 2005--2008 Mondeo 2.0 Duratec B5Y 2000--2007 Sedan Mondeo 2.0 Duratec BA7 2007--2014 Sedan
Full Duratorq 2.2 TDCi Report Full Duratec 2.0 Report